The path-way to justification, plainly proving I. What it is to be justified. II. That justification is by the faith of Jesus, and not by the works of the law. III. They only are justified that believe in Christ. IV. What it is to believe into Jesus Christ. V. The difference between the law of faith and the law of works, also the difference between the work of faith, and the works of the law is plainly stated. VI. Many objections answered. Written by Thomas Killcop.
Killcop, Thomas
Publisher: s n
Place of Publication:
London
Publication Year: 1660
Approximate Era: CharlesII
TCP ID: A87720 ESTC ID: R207954 STC ID: K438
Subject Headings:
Jesus Christ -- Devotional literature;
Justification;
Sermons, English -- 17th century;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections
View All References
Segment 192 located on Image 2
< Previous Segment
Next Segment >
| Location | Text | Standardized Text | Parts of Speech |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | as for instance, Rom. 3.27, 28. sith Justification is by faith, boasting (saith he) is excluded, but by what Law? by the Law of works, | as for instance, Rom. 3.27, 28. sith Justification is by faith, boasting (Says he) is excluded, but by what Law? by the Law of works, | c-acp p-acp n1, np1 crd, crd c-acp n1 vbz p-acp n1, vvg (vvz pns31) vbz vvn, cc-acp p-acp q-crq n1? p-acp dt n1 pp-f n2, |
Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)
Adjacent References with Relevance: Romans 3.27; Romans 3.27 (AKJV); Romans 3.28; Romans 3.28 (AKJV)
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
| Verse & Version | Verse Text | Text | Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note | Cosine Similarity Score | Cross Encoder Score | Okapi BM25 Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romans 3.27 (AKJV) | romans 3.27: where is boasting then? it is excluded. by what law? of works? nay: but by the law of faith. | as for instance, rom. 3.27, 28. sith justification is by faith, boasting (saith he) is excluded, but by what law? by the law of works, | False | 0.888 | 0.903 | 5.893 |
| Romans 3.27 (Tyndale) - 3 | romans 3.27: by the lawe of workes? naye: | by what law? by the law of works, | True | 0.846 | 0.873 | 0.0 |
| Romans 3.27 (ODRV) | romans 3.27: where is then thy boasting? it is excluded. by what law? of deeds? no, but by the law of faith. | as for instance, rom. 3.27, 28. sith justification is by faith, boasting (saith he) is excluded, but by what law? by the law of works, | False | 0.839 | 0.886 | 3.964 |
| Romans 3.27 (Geneva) | romans 3.27: where is then the reioycing? it is excluded. by what lawe? of woorkes? nay: but by the lawe of faith. | as for instance, rom. 3.27, 28. sith justification is by faith, boasting (saith he) is excluded, but by what law? by the law of works, | False | 0.837 | 0.755 | 1.017 |
| Romans 3.27 (ODRV) - 4 | romans 3.27: no, but by the law of faith. | by what law? by the law of works, | True | 0.824 | 0.718 | 2.425 |
| Romans 3.27 (AKJV) - 5 | romans 3.27: but by the law of faith. | by what law? by the law of works, | True | 0.823 | 0.674 | 2.425 |
| Romans 3.27 (Geneva) - 5 | romans 3.27: but by the lawe of faith. | by what law? by the law of works, | True | 0.807 | 0.695 | 0.0 |
| Romans 3.27 (AKJV) | romans 3.27: where is boasting then? it is excluded. by what law? of works? nay: but by the law of faith. | as for instance, rom. 3.27, 28. sith justification is by faith, boasting (saith he) is excluded | True | 0.803 | 0.805 | 1.445 |
| Romans 3.27 (Tyndale) | romans 3.27: where is then thy reioysinge? it is excluded. by what lawe? by the lawe of workes? naye: but by the lawe of fayth. | as for instance, rom. 3.27, 28. sith justification is by faith, boasting (saith he) is excluded, but by what law? by the law of works, | False | 0.791 | 0.75 | 0.708 |
| Romans 3.27 (ODRV) | romans 3.27: where is then thy boasting? it is excluded. by what law? of deeds? no, but by the law of faith. | as for instance, rom. 3.27, 28. sith justification is by faith, boasting (saith he) is excluded | True | 0.773 | 0.648 | 1.445 |
| Romans 3.27 (Geneva) | romans 3.27: where is then the reioycing? it is excluded. by what lawe? of woorkes? nay: but by the lawe of faith. | as for instance, rom. 3.27, 28. sith justification is by faith, boasting (saith he) is excluded | True | 0.752 | 0.285 | 0.98 |
| Romans 3.27 (Vulgate) - 5 | romans 3.27: sed per legem fidei. | by what law? by the law of works, | True | 0.741 | 0.589 | 0.0 |
Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
| Location | Phrase | Citations | Outliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | Rom. 3.27, 28. | Romans 3.27; Romans 3.28 |