The primitive rule of reformation delivered in a sermon before His Maiesty at Whitehall, Feb. 1, 1662 in vindication of our Church against the novelties of Rome by Tho. Pierce.

Pierce, Thomas, 1622-1691
Publisher: Printed by H H for Ric Royston and Ric Davis
Place of Publication: Oxford
Publication Year: 1663
Approximate Era: CharlesII
TCP ID: A54850 ESTC ID: R28152 STC ID: P2192
Subject Headings: Catholic Church -- Controversial literature; Reformation -- England;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections View All References



Segment 94 located on Page 24

< Previous Segment       Next Segment >

Location Text Standardized Text Parts of Speech
In-Text Aquinas so argues, as to imply it is Impossible, and imports a Contradiction, for one body to be locally in more places then one, and in all at once. But Bellarmine (at this) is so very angry, that in a kind of Revenge upon Aquinas, (though held to be the Ang•lical Doctor, ) he needs will inf•r 'tis as Impossible, and equally implies a Contradiction, for any one body at once to be so much as Sacramentally in more Places then one. And therefore it cannot now be wonder'd concerning Transubstantiation, if so long ago as in the time of Pope Nicolas the Second, either the Novelty was not forg'd and hammer'd out into the shape in which we find it, Aquinas so argues, as to imply it is Impossible, and imports a Contradiction, for one body to be locally in more places then one, and in all At once. But Bellarmine (At this) is so very angry, that in a kind of Revenge upon Aquinas, (though held to be the Ang•lical Doctor,) he needs will inf•r it's as Impossible, and equally Implies a Contradiction, for any one body At once to be so much as Sacramentally in more Places then one. And Therefore it cannot now be wondered Concerning Transubstantiation, if so long ago as in the time of Pope Nicolas the Second, either the Novelty was not forged and hammered out into the shape in which we find it, np1 av vvz, c-acp pc-acp vvi pn31 vbz j, cc vvz dt n1, p-acp crd n1 pc-acp vbi av-j p-acp dc n2 av pi, cc p-acp d p-acp a-acp. p-acp np1 (p-acp d) vbz av j j, cst p-acp dt n1 pp-f vvb p-acp np1, (cs vvn pc-acp vbi dt j n1,) pns31 av vmb j pn31|vbz p-acp j, cc av-jn vvz dt n1, p-acp d crd n1 p-acp a-acp pc-acp vbi av av-d c-acp av-j p-acp dc n2 av pi. cc av pn31 vmbx av vbi vvd vvg n1, cs av av-j av c-acp p-acp dt n1 pp-f n1 np1 dt ord, d dt n1 vbds xx vvn cc vvn av p-acp dt n1 p-acp r-crq pns12 vvb pn31,
Note 0 Corpus Christi non est co modo in •oc Sacramento sicut Corpus in loco, quod suis Dimensionibus loco commensuratur; sed quodam special• modo, qui est proprius huic Sacramento. Unde dicimus, quòd Corpus Christi est in diversis altaribus, non sicut in diversis locis, sed sicut in Sacramento. Nullo enim •odo Corpus Christi est in hoc Sacramento localiter, quia si •sset, divideretur à scipso. Aquin. Oper. Tom. 12. S•m. part. 3. q. 75. art. 1. ad 3. p. 23 2. col. 2. et q. 76. art. 3 et 5. ex. Edit. Antwerp. 1612. Corpus Christ non est counterfeit modo in •oc Sacramento sicut Corpus in loco, quod suis Dimensionibus loco commensuratur; sed Quodam special• modo, qui est proprius huic Sacramento. Unde dicimus, quòd Corpus Christ est in diversis altaribus, non sicut in diversis locis, sed sicut in Sacramento. Nullo enim •odo Corpus Christ est in hoc Sacramento localiter, quia si •sset, divideretur à scipso. Aquinas Operate Tom. 12. S•m. part. 3. q. 75. art. 1. and 3. p. 23 2. col. 2. et q. 76. art. 3 et 5. ex. Edit. Antwerp. 1612. fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la n1 fw-la p-acp fw-la np1 fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la; fw-la fw-la n1 fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la np1. fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la p-acp np1. n1 fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la np1 fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-fr fw-la. np1 np1 np1 crd np1. n1. crd sy. crd n1. crd cc crd n1 crd crd fw-fr. crd fw-la vvd. crd n1. crd fw-la crd fw-la. n1. np1. crd
Note 1 Si non posset esse unum Corpus local•ter in duobus locis, quia di•ideretur à •eipso, profectò nec esse posset Sacramentaliter eâdem ratione. Bellar. de Eucharistiâ, lib. 3. cap. 3. p. 511. Tom. 3, Controvers ▪ ex Edit. Paris. A. C. 1620. Si non posset esse Unum Corpus local•ter in duobus locis, quia di•ideretur à •eipso, profectò nec esse posset Sacramentaliter eâdem ratione. Bellar de Eucharistiâ, lib. 3. cap. 3. p. 511. Tom. 3, Controversy ▪ ex Edit. paris. A. C. 1620. fw-mi fw-fr n1 fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la p-acp fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-fr fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la n1 fw-la fw-la fw-la. np1 fw-fr fw-la, n1. crd n1. crd n1 crd np1 crd, n2 ▪ fw-la fw-la. np1. np1 np1 crd




Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)

Adjacent References with Relevance: Mark 14.15; Matthew 26.29
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
Verse & Version Verse Text Text Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note Cosine Similarity Score Cross Encoder Score Okapi BM25 Score




Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment. For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation, inclusive of all its parsed components.

Location Phrase Citations Outliers